| "Benefits" Under the Black Lung Benefits Act |
| Once eligibility under the Black Lung Benefits Act has been established, a totally disabled miner will receive benefit payments equal to a portion of the monthly pay rate for federal employees. Should the miner succumb to the pneumoconiosis disease, his surviving widow will be entitled to the same monthly benefit payment. If the miner has no surviving widow, his single surviving child will also receive the same monthly benefit amount. The benefit amount increases incrementally with each subsequent surviving child. Finally, if there is no surviving widow and no surviving children, the miner's dependent parents or siblings will receive a monthly benefit amount at the children's rate. The receipt of payments pursuant to workers' compensation or unemployment insurance may reduce these beneficiary amounts.More... |
| Knowledge of Injury Imputed to Employer |
| When an employer has actual knowledge of an employee's injury and its possible connection to the employee's work, most courts will excuse the employee's failure to timely give notice of the injury. Sometimes, however, such knowledge will be imputed to the employer. If a person associated with the employer in a managerial or representative role received knowledge of the injury, that knowledge will be charged to the employer. For example, consider the supervisor who witnessed the accident that caused the employee's injury. The employer itself will then be deemed to be aware of the employee's injury.More... |
| Workers' Compensation and Employee Status |
| Whether an individual is eligible to receive workers' compensation benefits turns on the individual's employment status. Only employees are entitled to such benefits; individual contractors are not.More... |
| Injured Employee's Recovery Election |
| Historically, when an employee was injured in the course of his employment, but at the hands of a negligent third party, he was technically able to pursue relief through both the workers' compensation system and a third-party action. Though not able to receive a double recovery, the employee was technically eligible to recover under either theory. However, strict election rules required that he choose which theory of recovery he would pursue, even if his "choice" ultimately left him with no compensation at all. For example, the injured employee elects to proceed with a third-party action, thereby foregoing workers' compensation, but ends up losing the third-party action. More... |
| Insurance Carrier Conflict of Interest |
| In the arena of workers' compensation and subrogation, the employee may be significantly impacted by the workers' compensation carrier's conflict of interest. The most negative impact would be found in those states denying the injured employee the right to maintain an action against the third party who actually caused his injury. Essentially, the carrier's principle conflict would arise when it is not only the employer's workers' compensation carrier but also the liability carrier for the third party. When this happens, the carrier's interest in paying as little as possible for the claim may be in competition with the employee's right to receive the best recovery possible.More... |
Rahaim & Saints
More Than 50 Years Combined Experience
